Who would moderate? The same ass clowns 🤡 from CNN they've had their chance and screwed it up, msnbc they seem like tRump cheerleaders half the time ⏲️ No fact check, then what is the point. Who's left, the BBC? They might be impartial but their not American which might not be a bad thing 🤔. Hey how about newsmax?, sorry bad joke. One of the Christian outlets ? Sorry worse joke.
Who would moderate? The same ass clowns 🤡 from CNN they've had their chance and screwed it up, msnbc they seem like tRump cheerleaders half the time ⏲️ No fact check, then what is the point. Who's left, the BBC? They might be impartial but their not American which might not be a bad thing 🤔. Hey how about newsmax?, sorry bad joke. One of the Christian outlets ? Sorry worse joke.
Good point. Because of your comment and preceding ones, I think I've changed my mind about the wisdom of Harris's debating the monster toddler. But it has to be he who refuses, not she, or he'll claim that she is afraid of him.
Henry, yes, that's it, Harris can't refuse to debate, and she has said "bring it on." She does have an advantage Hillary Clinton did not have 8 years ago; Harris has watched Trump at work all that time and I am certain has noted his weaknesses. Clinton thought she would be involved in a real debate with someone who had at least a bit of intelligence and some civility. Harris will not make the mistake of thinking that. Besides, in the courtroom, she has learned how to object and can use her courtroom voice to stop Trump's gish gallops and constant whining and forgetting. I am hoping the debate does not happen, but I think Harris can hold her own if it does.
Palealien, you know if "The Guardian" or any other "foreign" entity were to moderate, Trump would whine that they are not American. It would be a good way to make sure the debate never happens. Harris could call Trump out, though as a coward if he refuses to debate. It could be a win-win!
Who would moderate? The same ass clowns 🤡 from CNN they've had their chance and screwed it up, msnbc they seem like tRump cheerleaders half the time ⏲️ No fact check, then what is the point. Who's left, the BBC? They might be impartial but their not American which might not be a bad thing 🤔. Hey how about newsmax?, sorry bad joke. One of the Christian outlets ? Sorry worse joke.
Good point. Because of your comment and preceding ones, I think I've changed my mind about the wisdom of Harris's debating the monster toddler. But it has to be he who refuses, not she, or he'll claim that she is afraid of him.
Henry, yes, that's it, Harris can't refuse to debate, and she has said "bring it on." She does have an advantage Hillary Clinton did not have 8 years ago; Harris has watched Trump at work all that time and I am certain has noted his weaknesses. Clinton thought she would be involved in a real debate with someone who had at least a bit of intelligence and some civility. Harris will not make the mistake of thinking that. Besides, in the courtroom, she has learned how to object and can use her courtroom voice to stop Trump's gish gallops and constant whining and forgetting. I am hoping the debate does not happen, but I think Harris can hold her own if it does.
We should see if The Guardian does that sort of thing, they seem to be one of the few sources relatively unencumbered by falsehoods and agitprop.
Palealien, you know if "The Guardian" or any other "foreign" entity were to moderate, Trump would whine that they are not American. It would be a good way to make sure the debate never happens. Harris could call Trump out, though as a coward if he refuses to debate. It could be a win-win!
I think it's supposed to be ABC
Maybe you can do a better job as moderator David but I doubt it. CNN#1.