Walz lost so many chances to throw the things jerkydevilvillian said back into his face but he didn’t. The scowl on his face the whole time was not a good look. Where was the confident orator who seemed to be jovial, personable, and exciting to listen to? The moderators should’ve been fact checking in real time. It would’ve been a good w…
Walz lost so many chances to throw the things jerkydevilvillian said back into his face but he didn’t. The scowl on his face the whole time was not a good look. Where was the confident orator who seemed to be jovial, personable, and exciting to listen to? The moderators should’ve been fact checking in real time. It would’ve been a good way to knock that dipshit to the floor. It was a disappointing debate. For those who didn’t know either man, jerkydevilvillan was polished and personable even though WE know he’s full of shit. Walz looked defeated the moment he hit the stage. He truly needed some ooomph to propel him from sad sack to a polished style. He DID get some stingers in. One of my favorite answers was when dipshit said schools need more officers, locked doors, and stronger windows. I had to keep myself from puking. Anyway, my opinions however wrong they may seem to others. Overall, the evening was a disaster and shouldn’t even have taken place.
It’s my understanding that the rule of this debate was no fact checking was allowed. Why would Harris/Walz EVER agree to that is beyond me. Remember when the moderator fact checked Vance on something and Vance immediately jumped on him about the agreement to have no fact checking? Such BS. It should be a GIVEN that all parties will be fact checked. Period. That might keep things more honest.
Walz has a habit of frowning often. It definitely isn’t a good look, it seems to appear when he’s concentrating hard. The effect on viewers is off putting, appears to be a scowl. Challenging as it maybe, working with coaches to modify his habit will be beneficial.
Walz lost so many chances to throw the things jerkydevilvillian said back into his face but he didn’t. The scowl on his face the whole time was not a good look. Where was the confident orator who seemed to be jovial, personable, and exciting to listen to? The moderators should’ve been fact checking in real time. It would’ve been a good way to knock that dipshit to the floor. It was a disappointing debate. For those who didn’t know either man, jerkydevilvillan was polished and personable even though WE know he’s full of shit. Walz looked defeated the moment he hit the stage. He truly needed some ooomph to propel him from sad sack to a polished style. He DID get some stingers in. One of my favorite answers was when dipshit said schools need more officers, locked doors, and stronger windows. I had to keep myself from puking. Anyway, my opinions however wrong they may seem to others. Overall, the evening was a disaster and shouldn’t even have taken place.
It’s my understanding that the rule of this debate was no fact checking was allowed. Why would Harris/Walz EVER agree to that is beyond me. Remember when the moderator fact checked Vance on something and Vance immediately jumped on him about the agreement to have no fact checking? Such BS. It should be a GIVEN that all parties will be fact checked. Period. That might keep things more honest.
There was an option for fact-checking, I saw in another report today.
Walz has a habit of frowning often. It definitely isn’t a good look, it seems to appear when he’s concentrating hard. The effect on viewers is off putting, appears to be a scowl. Challenging as it maybe, working with coaches to modify his habit will be beneficial.