While the least qualified person ever to inhabit the White House is in court for his fraud trial (one of six ongoing cases—criminal and civil—in which he’s the defendant), I wanted to underscore two things being covered in the media that are helping to shape the context in which Donald is running for the Republican nomination.
First, in a shocking move, President Biden has decided to continue growing older.
[Insert endless screaming emoji here.]
Given the fact that the corporate media report incessantly on voters’ discontent vis-à-vis Biden’s age, I’ve been wondering—did people think Biden was going to get younger? Or did they intend for him to serve only one term during the most fraught moment in modern American politics?
The only reason I can think of for the constant reminders of Biden’s age (a subject that seems never to come up in discussions about Donald’s candidacy even though he is 77 years old)) is, as I wrote the other day, that there is practically nothing else with which to attack Biden (certainly nothing on par with all of Donald’s high crimes and misdemeanors). The media, if nothing else, deeply invested in the horse race.
Biden is 80. We knew four years ago that he’d be four years older when he ran for re-election in 2024. (At least I think that’s how aging and arithmetic work.) Do I wish President Biden were younger? Of course. I imagine he does, too. I wish I were younger—especially since the last seven years have felt like thirty. But if the question about Biden’s age keeps getting asked, then we need to respond consistently with a simple answer: “If Biden is old, so is Donald.”
2024 will almost certainly be a rematch between these two. So, we need to asking questions about their respective fitness for office. Would you rather have a competent, pro-democracy incumbent running the country? Or, would you rather throw the keys back to an incompetent fascist who’s itching to become an autocrat with the power to wreak vengeance upon his enemies, and destroy the Western alliance along with the tenets of liberal democracy upon which it’s based?
Tough call.
Or is it? Because according to a Washington Post / ABC News poll released ten days ago, it isn’t even close—Donald leads Biden by 9 points. I know this is old news and the poll isn’t legitimate. Even The Post acknowledged, after the fact, that the poll is an “outlier,” (a euphemistic, ass-covering way of saying its methodology is flawed).
The findings, which are obviously bullshit, aren’t what’s alarming, it’s the fact that they were published at all. What was the actual purpose? Any poll showing either Donald or Biden leading by over 10 points—13 months out from the election and given the recent voting history of the American electorate—is useless.
One takeaway is that the media is deeply invested in making sure Donald is the Republican nominee. By conducting this poll and phrasing the questions the way they did, ABC News and The Washington Post essentially crowned Donald the Republican presidential nominee four months before the first Republican primary in Iowa on January 15, 2024.
The success or failure of the other nominees, whether they had a shot at the nomination or not, has been totally pre-determined by the media’s obvious choice. They downplay or ignore the four indictments and 91 criminal charges facing Donald; they give him massive amounts of free airtime which he does not have to share with the other candidates; and they allow him to lie, obfuscate, and project without any meaningful oversight, pushback or fact-checking.
Corporate media are essentially short-circuiting the campaigns of any Republican not named Donald Trump. This is contrary to journalistic neutrality and a clear signal that the media is, once again, putting a thumb on the scale for Donald Trump.
___
The results of other polls tell us that up to half of Democrats would prefer the 2024 Democratic nominee to be somebody other than Joe Biden. How do we know this? Because the question is being asked. But what do “preferences” tell us about anything? I preferred several candidates over Biden in the 2020 Democratic primary but happily voted for him in the general election. No serious Democrat who “prefers” some theoretical other Democrat in the primary is going to vote for Donald Trump—or any of the current crop of Republicans running for the Republican nomination—for president.
Biden is leading his opponents for the Democratic nomination by a much greater margin than Donald is leading hisopponents in the Republican primary. It’s just that nobody bothers to mention that.
BONUS QUIZ
Last month, to prove his mental fitness, Donald recently challenged President Biden, 300-year-old Rupert Murdoch, and others to a duel of sorts. Part One will consist of all participants taking the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the test that Donald “aced” back in 2018.
Part Two, will be a still-to-be-determined but no doubt grueling physical challenge like—driving a golf cart?
Here’s the test. I wish you the best of luck.
BONUS TRACK
“Here is a secret I never have told
Maybe you'll understand why
I believe if I refuse to grow old
I can stay young till I die.”
“No Time at All,” Pippin (By the great Stephen Schwartz)
Pouring my morning coffee, a ritual that's powered my vibrant 72 years—and yes, folks, that's with no signs of slowing—I breezed through today's headlines. Between the sips and the startling realization that my coffee was more lukewarm than steaming, there it was: the media's fixation on Joe Biden's age. Is this our new national pastime?
The Wall Street Journal had its two cents, as always, suggesting 73% of Americans might want to see Biden trade the White House for a recliner. And the Associated Press? Their poll hinted 77% would prefer him recalling stories of his youth rather than planning the nation's future. Shockingly, 69% of Democrats seemed to be humming this rather off-key tune.
Now, I've faced my share of age-based assumptions, mainly from sprightly young baristas wondering if I need help with the coffee shop's app. (Little do they know I could code their app.) But must we hang our hats on age? Yes, a few less candles on Biden's birthday cake might appease some. But let's be honest, who among us wouldn't rewind the clock a bit?
Should age be the litmus test for leadership? Please. I'm north of 70, still clocking in, loving consulting, and, on occasion, serving up “I told you so”—with love, of course. And Biden in 2024? It's as predictable as my 3 pm craving for dark chocolate.
In my chats at work (yes, I’m still consulting, painting, writing, and managing a household), the consensus is clear: Biden's age isn’t the deal-breaker. Many, including me, will vote for him, age and all.
My wish list? It's vast. How about Republicans and the media acknowledging women, defending the sacred act of voting, and perhaps, admitting the 2020 elections weren’t some grand illusion? Mother Nature is throwing her tantrums with climate change, and some still deny her mood swings. And literature? Let's celebrate, not censor it.
Let’s not sugarcoat history for the young. And here's a juicy tidbit: the numbers hint that our economy thrives more vivaciously under Democrats. A fun fact I drop during those Zoom meetings when I want to raise a few eyebrows.
On the topics of guns, the military, veterans, and healthcare? Let's just say my years have given me enough wisdom to know where the balance should lie.
In conclusion, dear media, from a sprightly septuagenarian: retire this age narrative. I assure you, it's more worn out than my vintage '80s stiletto heels—and those have seen some miles.
Thank you, Mary, for tonight's column.
I am exhausted of hearing about Biden's age. He is adept and cares about doing his presidential job diligently.
Take Care. 💙